I have never done this before, just linking to an online piece. The link here is transcript of testimony by Michael Cannon of the Cato Institute before the Committee on the Judiciary of the U.S. House of Representatives. It is enumeration of President Obama’s illegal and unconstitutional actions vis-a-vis rollout of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, aka PPACA aka ACA aka “Obamacare”.
The “do it” of my title question is impeachment. In January of 2014 at the opening of congress in the new year is it incumbent on the members of the Committee on the Judiciary of the U.S. House of Representatives to hold hearings on the matter?
Should the segment of today’s “We the People” who revere liberty over tyranny, who respect the rule of law over the rule of the tyrannical, who understand the critical importance of the Constitution over nonlegal progressivism/liberalism, should we want the feet of Speaker Boehner held to such a fire? Should we wish during 2014 primaries season to have those who knew to what they were swearing with their oaths of office and actually meant it distinguished from those of both parties who had Pinocchio moments when swearing?
Despite the reality that impeachment proceedings, including the here-hoped-for trial in the Senate, would be in a race with the mid-term elections, would it be in America’s best interest to have said be the focus that it would surely be? Would the proceedings preclude this Administration from distracting both We the People and so-called “news media” with NSA, IRS, CIA, “fast and furious”, and Benghazis? Would it rivet focus on the truth that “Obamacare” is not, and can not, be the “law of the land”?